虎扑体育网

作为历史三双王的威斯布鲁克的表现现如今饱受争议。在洛杉矶湖人度过一段并不开心的日子后，威斯布鲁克在洛杉矶的另一支球队-快船开启了职业生涯的新阶段。

从三双拿到手软的数据帝到球迷们口诛笔伐的球队吸血鬼，威斯布鲁克的个人数据究竟对球队的影响有多大呢？

美媒HaterMuse晒出了一张威少奇才时期季后赛对阵费城76人比赛时的个人数据单：19分，投篮19中3，21个篮板，14次助攻，奇才终场前7.5秒处于领先。随后发问：那么，这对球队究竟是积极的影响还是消极的影响？尤其是在季后赛中

·But but he has a triple double…

但是他拿到了一次三双...

·回复上一条：

so you mean to tell me 21 rebounds doesn’t affect the game?

所以你的意思是告诉我21个篮板无法影响比赛？

·回复上一条：

Yeah but how many of those rebounds were his own bricked shots?

是的，但这些篮板中有多少是因为他自己的投篮打铁呢？

·Efficiency man fans would still call this a good game cause his VORP is 3.7862

讲效率的球迷们仍然会称这是一场好比赛，因为他的 VORP（不可替代值） 是 3.7862

·回复上一条：

Nikola Jokic is the most efficient player in the NBA. The odds of him shooting that poorly are effectively 0.

尼古拉·约基奇是NBA效率最高的球员。他投篮糟糕的概率实际上是0。

·they’re literally winning

他们真的赢了

·回复上一条:

I mean your team can win while you have a negative impact.

我的意思是，当你产生负面影响时，你的球队可以获胜。

·They Lost that series

他们输掉了那轮系列赛

·If he has 3 shot made and 19 points that means he got fouled on a lot of his shot attempts meaning he still got points for a missed shot so he definitely has a positive impact

如果他命中3次投篮还得了19分，这意味着他在很多投篮尝试中都被犯规，这意味着他仍然能靠投篮失误而得分，所以他肯定会产生积极的影响。

·The biggest problem is that he's holding the ball in clutch time.

最大的问题是让他在关键时刻持球。

·14 assists means he contributed to at least 28 more points

14次助攻意味着他至少能多贡献28分

·Yea Dc was a good fit for him, it was his decision to ask them to trade him to La

是的，华盛顿奇才很适合他，他决定要求让他们把他交易到洛杉矶湖人

·His team is about to win the game so clearly yes

他的球队即将赢得比赛，所以很明显是积极的

·They are winning and despite being 3/19 he still found a way to get 19pts without mentioning 14 assists and 21 rebounds so yes of course this is positive impact

他们赢了，尽管是19投3中，但他仍然找到了一种方法来获得19分，这还没提到14次助攻和21个篮板，所以是的，这当然是积极的影响。

·The Wizards did win that game lol

奇才还确实赢了比赛，哈哈

·See his stat, then the score. So I guess having that kind of night was positive impact.

看看他的数据，然后是比分。 所以我想对于这样的夜晚是积极的影响。

·The question is, is this kind of stat reliable enough to win it all? If it a yes, then go ahead and keep doing it. Sadly we know the answer is NO. This may work for a game or even a 7 game series. But not to win it all.

问题是，这种数据是否足够可靠，可以赢得这一切？如果是，那就继续做下去。可悲的是，我们知道答案是否定的。这可能适用于一场比赛甚至 7场系列赛。但不是为了赢得一切。

·For that one specific game, the 21 boards and 14 assists were definitely impactful. For the entire series as a whole, just look above the scoreboard. This type of efficiency does not win any playoff series

对于那场比赛，21个板和14次助攻绝对是有影响力的。对于整个系列赛，只需查看上方的记分牌即可。这种效率不会赢得任何季后赛系列赛

·21 Reb and 14 assist definitely a positive impact in ANY ERA😂

21篮板和14助攻在任何时代都绝对是积极的影响

·Proof that YOU don’t always have to score to make a positive impact on the game.

证明你不必总是得分才能对比赛产生积极影响。

·I'm no fan of Westbrooks but showing single game or even last few game stat lines to make a point is just silly, especially on a new to him team.

我不是威斯布鲁克斯的球迷，但展示单场比赛甚至最后几场比赛的数据来表达观点是愚蠢的，尤其是在他的新球队中。

·He got those rebounds catch his own missed layups

他接住了自己错过的上篮，得到了这些篮板

·They won the game, but his efficiency was garbage. So I would say yes and no.

他们赢得了比赛，但他的效率是垃圾。所以我会说是和不是。

·well yeah it is, that was the only game they won

嗯，是的，这是他们赢得的唯一一场比赛

·You can shoot 5% from the field and be the best player on the court. Look at Ben Wallace and Dennis Rodman.

你可以投篮命中率只有5%，就成为球场上最好的球员。 看看本·华莱士和丹尼斯·罗德曼。

·Commenters acting like Russ took the Wizards to the eastern conference finals with those triple doubles🤣

评论区的人表现得就像像威少用那些三双将奇才队带到了东部决赛一样

·Considering it was a win or go home game and it led to them winning. Yeah I’d say so

考虑到这是一场胜利或回家的比赛，这让他们获胜了。是的，我会这么说

...

这是如今典型的威斯布鲁克式数据，你认为这种个人表现对球队的影响是好是坏呢？

欢迎点赞、关注和转发